Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bond et al. v. Floyd et al., 1966 — 384 U.S. 997 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Bond et al. v. Floyd et al.
384 U.S. 997·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and the question of jurisdiction.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1125.
Bond et al. v. Floyd et al.
Leonard B. Boudin and Victor Rabinowitz for appellants. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, and William L. Harper, Alfred L. Evans, Jr., and Paul L. Hanes, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees. Melvin L. Wulf and Charles Morgan, Jr., for American Civil Liberties Union et al., and Hubert T. Delany for Emergency Civil Liberties Committee, as amici curiae, in support of appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ga. Motion to advance denied. Probable jurisdiction noted.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and the question of jurisdiction.