Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sarah D. Thompson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Virgil D. Thompson, Deceased, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent, 1906 — 183 N.Y. 558 · caselaw · US
General
Sarah D. Thompson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Virgil D. Thompson, Deceased, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent
183 N.Y. 558·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah D. Thompson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Virgil D. Thompson, Deceased, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Street Railway Company, Respondent.
(Argued December 12, 1905;
decided January 9, 1906.)
Thompson v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 103 App. Div. 595, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 18, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Petté for appellant.
Joseph F. Daly, Bayard H. Ames and Henry A. Robinson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Bbien, Babtlett, Haight, Vann and Webneb, JJ. Not sitting: Gbay, J.