General
E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA
359 U.S. 283 L. Ed. 2d 625·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Whittaker and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in these cases.
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
E T & W N C TRANSPORTATION CO. v. CURRIE, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 524.
Decided March 2, 1959.
Kester Walton and James H. Epps, Jr. for appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed. Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, and Williams v. Stockham Valves & Fittings, Inc., 358 U. S. 450.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Whittaker and Mr. Justice Stewart dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in these cases.