Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Augustus Van Keuren et al., Respondents, v. William Starr Miller, Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 583 · caselaw · US
General
Augustus Van Keuren et al., Respondents, v. William Starr Miller, Appellant
149 N.Y. 583·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Augustus Van Keuren et al., Respondents, v. William Starr Miller, Appellant.
Van Keuren v. Miller, 78 Hun, 173, affirmed.
(Argued April 16, 1896;
decided May 1, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made May 16, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Esselstyn & McCarty for appellant.
A. Lee Wager for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs and ten per cent damages under section 3251 of Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion."
All concur.