Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Morris Fox, Respondent, v. Warren D. Hopkins et al., as Executors of Nelson K. Hopkins, Deceased, Appellants, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 515 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Morris Fox, Respondent, v. Warren D. Hopkins et al., as Executors of Nelson K. Hopkins, Deceased, Appellants
186 N.Y. 515·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Morris Fox, Respondent, v. Warren D. Hopkins et al., as Executors of Nelson K. Hopkins, Deceased, Appellants.
Fox v. Hopkins, 84 App. Div. 633, affirmed.
(Argued June 13, 1906;
decided October 2, 1906.)
Appp:al from a judgment entered March 30, 1905, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action by a tenant to recover from his landlord damages caused by water leaking into the demised premises.
George Wadsworth for appellants.
Simon Eleischmann and Pa/oid liuslander for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.