General
Southern Railway, Carolina Division, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fannie G. Driggs and her Husband, H. D. Driggs; Southern Railway, Carolina Division, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hubert Driggs, by his Guardian ad litem, H. D. Driggs
242 U.S. 612·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 31.
Southern Railway, Carolina Division, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fannie G. Driggs and her Husband, H. D. Driggs; Southern Railway, Carolina Division, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hubert Driggs, by his Guardian ad litem, H. D. Driggs.
and No. 32.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina.
Submitted October 25, 1916.
Decided October 30, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgments reversed with costs upon the authority of Kansas City Southern Ry. v. Carl, 227 U. S. 639, 653; Boston & Maine R. Co. v. Hooker, 233 U. S. 97, 110-113; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Maxwell, 237 U. S. 94, 97-98. Mr. Benjamin Lindsay Abney and Mr. John K. Graves for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Stanwix G. Mayfield for the defendants in error.