General
Agricultural Prorate Commission of California et al. v. Mutual Orange Distributors et al.
318 U.S. 744·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 288.
Agricultural Prorate Commission of California et al. v. Mutual Orange Distributors et al.
April 5, 1943.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion to vacate the judgment is granted. The judgment of the District Court is vacated, without costs to either party in this Court, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint as moot. United States v. Hamburg-American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-8; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Paramount Pictures v. Langer, 306 U. S. 619; Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union v. Union Premier Food Stores, 308 U. S. 526.
Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants. Mr. Guy Richards Crump for appellees.