Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson, 1850 — 50 U.S. 602 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson
50 U.S. 6029 How. 602·Supreme Court of the United States·1850
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Smith Hogan, Arthur S. Hogan, and Richard Y. Reynolds, Plaintiffs in error, v. Aaron Ross, who sues for the use of Robert Patterson.
Where no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, the cause - must be dismissed on motion.
This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the District Court ot the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi.
The order of the ciourt explains the ground of its dismissal, upon, the motion of Mr. Coxe.
[MAJORITY]
Order.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript, of the record from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Mississippi, and on the motion of Richard S. Coxe, Esquire,.of counsel for the defendant in error, stating that no citation had been issued or served upon the defendant in error, was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.