Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Konigsberg v. State Bar of California et al., 1960 — 362 U.S. 910 · caselaw · US
General
Konigsberg v. State Bar of California et al.
362 U.S. 910·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 661.
Konigsberg v. State Bar of California et al.
Edward Mosk and Samuel Rosenwein for petitioner.
Frank B. Belcher and Ralph E. Lewis for respondents. A. L. Wirin and Hugh R. Manes for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to use record in No. 5, October Term, 1956, granted. Motion of American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California granted.