Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawrence J. O'Connor, Appellant, v. Horace Waldo, Individually and as Administrator of Francis W. Waldo, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1899 — 158 N.Y. 672 · caselaw · US
General
Lawrence J. O'Connor, Appellant, v. Horace Waldo, Individually and as Administrator of Francis W. Waldo, Deceased, et al., Respondents
158 N.Y. 672·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lawrence J. O’Connor, Appellant, v. Horace Waldo, Individually and as Administrator of Francis W. Waldo, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
(Argued January 13, 1899;
decided January 31, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 25,1895, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term, and granting a new trial.
O’Connor v. Waldo, 83 Hun, 489, affirmed.
John P. Abney and Charles E. O' Connor for appellant.
Charles E. Miller and Henry W. Goodrich for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered for defend-1 ants on the stipulation, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting.