Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George E. ROBSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1933 — 64 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George E. ROBSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
64 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George E. ROBSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6682.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 15, 1933.
C. F. Maris, of Roundup, Mont., Albert Andersen, of Billings, Mont., and Molumby, Busha & Greenan, of Great Falls, Mont., for appellant.
Wellington D. Rankin, U. S. Atty., and Sam D. Goza, Jr., and Arthur F. Aeher, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Helena, Mont., for ap-pellee.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of tbe record and briefs and after oral argument of respective counsel, ordered judgment of District Court affirmed; judgment of affirmance be filed and entered, and mandate issued as provided for by rule 32.