Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Catharine J. Brown, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 663 · caselaw · US
General
Catharine J. Brown, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
156 N.Y. 663·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catharine J. Brown, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Brown v. N. T. G. & JBJ. JR. JR. R. Go., 88 Hun, 631, affirmed.
(Argued May 4, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 15, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
S. W. Jackson for appellant.
Alonzo P. Strong for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.