Corporations
Franklin Pettit, Appellant, v. George B. McClellan, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, Respondents
185 N.Y. 529·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Franklin Pettit, Appellant, v. George B. McClellan, as Mayor of the City of New York, et al., Constituting the Board of Estimate and Apportionment of the City of New York, Respondents.
Pettit v. McClellan, 110 App. Div. 390, affirmed.
(Argued March 6, 1906;
decided April 24, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 11, 1906, which affirmed a judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in a taxpayer’s action to test the constitutionality of chapter 629 of the Laws- of 1905.
L. Laflin Kellogg and Alfred C. Petté for appellant.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Connoly and William P. Burr of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Wilcox v. McClellan (185 N. Y. 9).
Concur : Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight,Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Hiscock, JJ.