Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Martin et al. v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association, 1939 — 305 U.S. 666 · caselaw · US
General
Martin et al. v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association
305 U.S. 666·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 277.
Martin et al. v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association.
January 16, 1939.
Messrs. Leo E. Vaudrev.il, Assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin, and Joseph P. Brazy for petitioners.
Messrs. Charles E. Wyzanski, Jr., Archibald Cox, and Emery J. Woodall for First Federal Savings & Loan Assn., respondent.
Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Solicitor General Bell, and Mr. Warner W. Gardner for the United States, intervening-respondent.
By leave of Court, Messrs. John B. Hollister, Horace Bus-sell, Robert A. Taft, John R. Bullock, and Robert B. Jacoby filed a brief on behalf of the Federal Savings & Loan Division of the United States Building & Loan League, as amicus curiae, in support of respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, ante, p. 564, to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Dismissed on motion of counsel for the petitioners.