Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Coates's Lessee versus Hamilton, 1796 — 2 U.S. 256 · caselaw · US
General
Coates's Lessee versus Hamilton
2 U.S. 2562 Dall. 256·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1796·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Coates’s Lessee versus Hamilton.
BY mistake the dernise had been laid in the declaration, so as to commence before the death of the person, whose death gave rise to the controversy. Ingersoll, therefore, moved for leave to amend the declaration, by rectifying this mistake:
[MAJORITY — By the Court:]
By the Court:
—Let the amendment be made.