Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David S. Randall, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant, 1891 — 129 N.Y. 629 · caselaw · US
General
David S. Randall, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant
129 N.Y. 629·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David S. Randall, Respondent, v. The State of New York, Appellant.
(Argued October 27, 1891;
decided December 1, 1891.)
Appeal from award made by the Board of Claims December 19,1888.
Charles F. Tabor, Attorney-General, for appellant.
Melvin F. Stephens for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Award affirmed.