Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Respublica v. Campbell, 1788 — 1 U.S. 354 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Respublica v. Campbell
1 U.S. 3541 Dall. 354·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1788·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Respublica v. Campbell.
Forcible entry.
. This was an inquisition of forcible entry, &c., taken before two justices of Lancaster county. The proceedings being removed by certiorari into this court, Bradford now moved that they might be quashed ; and showed for cause, that the defendant is stated in the inquest to have been possessed, but no estate or term is laid ; which, he said, was adjudged to be insufficient in a case of Respublica v. Scott; the court there observing that Hawkins was express, that an inquisition of forcible entry, &c., will not lie in the case of a tenant at will.
[MAJORITY — By the Court.]
By the Court.
Let the proceedings be quashed.
See Respublica v. Shryber, ante, p. 68, and the cases cited there.