Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stief v. J. A. Sexauer Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al., 1967 — 389 U.S. 897 · caselaw · US
General
Stief v. J. A. Sexauer Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al.
389 U.S. 897·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 455.
Stief v. J. A. Sexauer Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al.
B. Nathaniel Richter, Charles A. Lord and Seymour I. Toll for petitioner.
Benjamin H. Siff for J. A. Sexauer Manufacturing Co., Inc., and S. Hazard Gillespie and /. Roger Carroll for Diamond Alkali Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.