Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States et al., 1943 — 319 U.S. 729 · caselaw · US
General
L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States et al.
319 U.S. 729·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 520.
L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States et al.
May 24, 1943.
[MAJORITY]
It is ordered that the opinion of this Court be amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:
“We have considered appellant’s attack on the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Commission’s findings, and conclude, as did the court below, that they are adequately supported by substantial evidence of record. Compare Florida v. United States, 292 U. S. 1, 12; Merchants Warehouse Co. v. United States, supra, 508.”
The petition for rehearing is denied.
Opinion reported as amended, ante, p. 1.