Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hannah K. Gibbons, Appellant, v. Philip Berolzheimer, Respondent, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 575 · caselaw · US
General
Hannah K. Gibbons, Appellant, v. Philip Berolzheimer, Respondent
187 N.Y. 575·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hannah K. Gibbons, Appellant, v. Philip Berolzheimer, Respondent.
Reported below, 103 App. Div. 609.
(Argued February 18, 1907;
decided February 26, 1907.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 26, 1905, affirming a judgment in ■ favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to redeem certain shares of stock or to recover for the value thereof.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal had not been perfected by filing the required undertaking.
M. E. Harby for motion.
Ralph Stout opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.