Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edith Y. Price, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 516 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Edith Y. Price, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant
182 N.Y. 516·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edith Y. Price, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.
(Argued May 29, 1905;
decided June 6, 1905.)
Price v. City of New York, 104 App. Div. 198, appeal dismissed.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the, Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 25, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously affirmed the judgment as to the facts and no question of law was presented that could be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.
George W. McKenzie for motion.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (Edward H. Wilson of counsel), opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal' dismissed, with costs of appeal and ten dollars costs of motion.