Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Samuel W. Perry, Deceased, Assignee, etc., by Rebecca V. Perry et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. Alexander Fraser et al., Appellants, 1889 — 114 N.Y. 616 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Samuel W. Perry, Deceased, Assignee, etc., by Rebecca V. Perry et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. Alexander Fraser et al., Appellants
114 N.Y. 616·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Final Accounting of Samuel W. Perry, Deceased, Assignee, etc., by Rebecca V. Perry et al., as Executors, etc., Respondents, v. Alexander Fraser et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 11, 1889;
decided March 19, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made November 15, 1887, which affirmed a decree of the county judge of Chemung county upon a final accounting by plaintiffs, as executors of a deceased general assignee.
Roswell R. Moss for appellants.
Gabriel L. Smith for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of court below.
All concur, except Follett, Ch. J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.