Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. v. United States to the use of the Baltimore Brick Co.; and John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. v. Friedman, trading as J. Friedman Co., 1946 — 328 U.S. 865 · caselaw · US
General
John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. v. United States to the use of the Baltimore Brick Co.; and John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. v. Friedman, trading as J. Friedman Co.
328 U.S. 865·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1195.
No. 1196.
John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. v. United States to the use of the Baltimore Brick Co.; and John A. Johnson & Sons, Inc. et al. v. Friedman, trading as J. Friedman Co.
June 10, 1946.
Emanuel Harris for petitioners.
Jesse Slingluff, Jr. for respondent in No. 1195.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.