Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stoike v. First National Bank of the City of New York, 1943 — 320 U.S. 762 · caselaw · US
General
Stoike v. First National Bank of the City of New York
320 U.S. 762·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 170.
Stoike v. First National Bank of the City of New York.
October 11, 1943.
Mr. Daniel William Leider for petitioner. Mr. Lowell Wadmond for respondent. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Douglas B. Maggs filed a brief on behalf of the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division, U. S. Dept, of Labor, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of New York denied.