Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Burns, Governor of Hawaii v. Richardson et al.; Cravalho et al. v. Richardson et al.; and Abe et al. v. Richardson et al., 1965 — 382 U.S. 807 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Burns, Governor of Hawaii v. Richardson et al.; Cravalho et al. v. Richardson et al.; and Abe et al. v. Richardson et al.
382 U.S. 807·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 318.
Burns, Governor of Hawaii v. Richardson et al.; Cravalho et al. v. Richardson et al. ; and Abe et al. v. Richardson et al.
Bert T. Kobayashi, Attorney General of Hawaii, Bertram T. Kanbara and Nobuki Kamida, Deputy Attorneys General, Thurman Arnold, Abe Fortas and Dennis G. Lyons for appellant in No. 318 and for appellee Burns in Nos. 323 and 409.
James T. Funaki and Eugene W. I. Lau for appellants in No. 323. Kazuhisa Abe for appellants in No. 409.
Richard K. Sharpless on motion of Harold S. Roberts for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, in Nos. 318 and 323.
No. 323.
No. 409.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. Hawaii. Motion of Harold S. Roberts for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, in Nos. 318 and 323, granted. Probable jurisdiction noted. The cases are consolidated and a total of three hours is allotted for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Reported below: 238 F. Supp. 468; 240 F. Supp. 724.