Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Casper Dort, Appellant, v. Eva Nicken, Respondent, 1891 — 130 N.Y. 637 · caselaw · US
General
Casper Dort, Appellant, v. Eva Nicken, Respondent
130 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Casper Dort, Appellant, v. Eva Nicken, Respondent.
(Submitted October 12, 1891;
decided October 27, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fifth judicial department, made October 19,1889, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Myron II Beck for appellant.
William Ü. Fitch for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse order and to affirm judgment of Special Term on opinion of Daniels, J., at Special Term.
All concur.
Ordered accordingly.