Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sullivan et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, 1966 — 385 U.S. 852 · caselaw · US
General
Sullivan et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor
385 U.S. 852·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Black, believing petitioners were wrongfully denied their constitutional right to a trial by jury, would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment below.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 420.
Sullivan et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor.
Ruth S. Sullivan for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Charles Donahue, Bessie Margolin and Robert E. Nagle for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black, believing petitioners were wrongfully denied their constitutional right to a trial by jury, would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment below.