Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
National Labor Relations Board v. Garwin Corp. et al.; Garwin Corp. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Local 57, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 1967 — 387 U.S. 942 · caselaw · US
General
National Labor Relations Board v. Garwin Corp. et al.; Garwin Corp. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Local 57, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board
387 U.S. 942·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1251.
No. 1257.
No. 1327.
National Labor Relations Board v. Garwin Corp. et al.; Garwin Corp. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al.; and Local 57, International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board.
Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Lawrence M. Joseph for petitioner in No. 1251 and for respondent in Nos. 1257 and 1327. Guy Farmer and Joseph A. Perkins for petitioners in No. 1257 and for respondents in No. 1251. Morris P. Glushien and Max Zirnny for petitioner in No. 1327.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 126 U. S. App. D. C. 81, 374 F. 2d 295.