Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nina Grace Goldbacher, Respondent, v. George W. Eggers, Appellant, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 551 · caselaw · US
General
Nina Grace Goldbacher, Respondent, v. George W. Eggers, Appellant
179 N.Y. 551·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nina Grace Goldbacher, Respondent, v. George W. Eggers, Appellant.
Goldbacher v. Eggei's, 82 App. Div. 637, affirmed.
(Submitted June 15, 1904;
decided August 5, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division, of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 4, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
George E. Hyatt and A. Walker Otis for appellant.
Josejph N Goldbacher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.