Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; and General Telephone Company of California v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al., 1978 — 439 U.S. 1052 · caselaw · US
General
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; and General Telephone Company of California v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.
439 U.S. 1052·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Mr. Justice Marshall and Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78-606.
No. 78-607.
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; and General Telephone Company of California v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Cal. Motions for leave to file briefs as amici curiae, in both cases, filed by Southern Co., Communications Workers of America, Sierra Pacific Power Co. et al., and California Independent Telephone Assn., granted. Motions for leave to file briefs as amici curiae in No. 78-606, filed by Edison Electric Institute and Dallas Power & Light Co. et al., granted. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall and Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.