Tax
Carlo MARCHETTI, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; Henry M. FOWLER and Edward J. Blacker, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
50 F.2d 1079·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Carlo MARCHETTI, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. Henry M. FOWLER and Edward J. Blacker, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Nos. 6530, 6531.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 22, 1931.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Ordered motion of petitioner, or petitioners, in each of above causes, for dismissal of petition to review, consented to by counsel for respondent, granted, that judgments of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.