Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Weaver v. Lawrence, 1788 — 1 U.S. 379 · caselaw · US
General
Weaver v. Lawrence
1 U.S. 3791 Dall. 379·Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas·1788·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Weaver v. Lawrence.
Inquisition.
Where an inquisition upon lands, under a fi. fa., has been quashed for irregularity, the sheriff may proceed to hold a new inquest, after the return of thefi. fa., without a new writ.
There had been a levy upon lands, by virtue of a fi. fia. issued in this case, returnable to the present term; and now, on Levy's motion, the inquisition, which had been held upon the value of the lands, was quashed.
It then became a question, whether a new fi. fa. must be issued; or whether the sheriff might proceed, after the return of the former writ, to take a new inquisition, without further process ?
[MAJORITY — Shipper, President.]
Shipper, President.
I cannot perceive anything in the act of assembly which precludes the sheriff from holding an inquest, after the return of the fi. fa. ; and I have always understood it to be the *practice to do so. pogQ The present inquisition, being quashed for irregularity, becomes a L nullity, and leaves the case just as if none had been taken.
See McCormick v. Meason, 1 S. & R. 92; Miller v. Milford, 2 Id. 35.