Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bynum et al. v. United States, 1974 — 417 U.S. 903 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Bynum et al. v. United States
417 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1974
Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse the judgment. United States v. Giordano, 416 U. S. 505, 580 (1974) (Douglas, J., concurring), and United States v. Chavez, 416 U. S. 562, 580 (1974) (Douglas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 73-856.
Bynum et al. v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Giordano, 416 U. S. 505 (1974).
Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse the judgment. United States v. Giordano, 416 U. S. 505, 580 (1974) (Douglas, J., concurring), and United States v. Chavez, 416 U. S. 562, 580 (1974) (Douglas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).