Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isamu KOBAYASHI, Appellant, v. John D. NAGLE, Commissioner of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, California, Appellee, 1932 — 55 F.2d 1080 · caselaw · US
General
Isamu KOBAYASHI, Appellant, v. John D. NAGLE, Commissioner of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, California, Appellee
55 F.2d 1080·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isamu KOBAYASHI, Appellant, v. John D. NAGLE, Commissioner of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, California, Appellee.
No. 6424.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 18, 1932.
Philip M. Zwerin and George R. Andersen, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Geo. J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and H. A. Tan Der Zee, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal, for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for appellant, or-, dered appeal dismissed.