Contracts · MBE-tested
National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., et al.
389 U.S. 909·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 163.
National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., et al. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. Colo. The United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission requested to address themselves further to issue of mootness in this case, in particular to statement in their memorandum that the issue with respect to restraining order entered by the District Court “is not moot because it would affect appellants’ claims for restitution of charges paid under the increased rates.”
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this order.