Contracts · MBE-tested
FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE et al. v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE
371 U.S. 5·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FAIRVIEW PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE et al. v. CITY OF ANCHORAGE.
No. 223.
Decided October 8, 1962.
George E. C. Hayes for appellants.
Charles S. Rhyne for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.