Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lee Lock, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of California, 1904 — 195 U.S. 623 · caselaw · US
General
Lee Lock, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of California
195 U.S. 623·Supreme Court of the United States·1904
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 333.
Lee Lock, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of California.
In error to the Supreme CourtN of the State of California.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 11, 1904.
Decided October 17, 1904.
Mr. Henry C. McPike arid Mr. A. H. Jarman for plaintiff in error.
Mr. U. S. Webb and Mr. James H. Campbell for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, but without costs.