General
Harriet A. Tilton, Respondent, v. John B. Murray, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
187 N.Y. 519·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harriet A. Tilton, Respondent, v. John B. Murray, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Tilton v. Murray, 108 App. Div. 366, affirmed.
(Argued December 14, 1906;
decided January 8, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 17, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action upon a promissory note. -
Charles L. Andrus and David Murray for appellant.
■ Henry L. Scheuerman, Henry Siegrist, Jr., and Jacob Newman for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.