Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DuPont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and Raskob v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 1941 — 314 U.S. 623 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
DuPont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and Raskob v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
314 U.S. 623·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 200.
No. 201.
DuPont v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; and Raskob v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
October 13, 1941.
Messrs. Joseph M. Hartfield, Walter S. Orr, and A. Chauncey Newlin for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and Arnold Raum for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Reported below: 118 P. 2d 544.