Contracts · MBE-tested
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
389 U.S. 849·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 93.
Public Service Electric & Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Edward S. Kirby for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Richard A. Solomon, Peter H. Schiff and William H. Arkin for the Federal Power Commission; Richard J. Connor, Thomas F. Ryan, Jr., Thomas F. Broman, Lawrence H. Gall and William N. Bonner, Jr., for Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., and William K. Tell, Jr., and James D. Annett for Texaco Inc., respondents.
William. T. Coleman, Jr., Robert W. Maris, Vincent P. McDevitt, Samuel G. Miller, David K. Kadane, Bertro/m D. Moll, Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, William Gural, Deputy Attorney General, Scott Scammell, John R. Sailer and Robert C. Koury on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of Northwest Jersey Natural Gas, Inc., et al. for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.