Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNION CENT. LIFE INS. CO. v. MATTHEW, 1929 — 33 F.2d 899 · caselaw · US
General
UNION CENT. LIFE INS. CO. v. MATTHEW
33 F.2d 899·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1929
Before RUDKIN and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges, and BEAN, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNION CENT. LIFE INS. CO. v. MATTHEW.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 3, 1929.
No. 5645.
For former opinion, see 32 F.(2d) 97.
F. Eldred Boland and Knight, Boland & Christin, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant Insurance Company.
Dinkelspiel & Dinkelspiel, of San Francisco, for appellant Coppin.
Thomas B. MeCue, of San Francisco, Cal., and Clifton Hildebrand, of Oakland, Cal., for appellee.
Before RUDKIN and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges, and BEAN, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.]
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The appellee has filed a petition for rehearing, contending for the first time that the grace period allowed for the payment of premiums ran from the date of the policy, not from the date' when the premiums were payable, and that the time allowed for the payment of the third annual premium had not expired at the time of the death of the insured. This belated contention is without merit. Johnson v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. (C. C. A.) 143 F. 950; McCampbell v. New York Life Ins. Co. (C. C. A.) 288 F. 465; Methvin v. Fidelity Mut. Life Assn., 129 Cal. 251, 61 P. 1112; Tibbits v. Mutual Ben. Life Ins. Co., 159 Ind. 671, 65 N. E. 1033; Wilkie v. New York Life Ins. Co., 146 N. C. 513, 60 S. E. 427; Wilkinson v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co., 176 Ky. 833, 197 S. W. 557, 6 A. L. R. 769; Tigg v. Register Life Ins. Co., 152 Iowa, 720, 133 N. W. 322.
The petition for rehearing is denied.