Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MIAMI REAL ESTATE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Margaret Spence EASTWOOD, a Widow, Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
Corporations
MIAMI REAL ESTATE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Margaret Spence EASTWOOD, a Widow, Appellee
63 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MIAMI REAL ESTATE COMPANY, a Florida Corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Margaret Spence EASTWOOD, a Widow, Appellee.
No. 6622.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 22, 1933.
Bart A. Riley, of Miami, Fla., for appellants.
Charles A. Carroll and Joseph Otto, both of Miami, Fla., for appellee.
t o™ Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The decree is affirmed.