Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
KAZUO NITTA, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, District Director of Immigration for the Port of San Francisco, California, Appellee, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
KAZUO NITTA, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, District Director of Immigration for the Port of San Francisco, California, Appellee
75 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KAZUO NITTA, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, District Director of Immigration for the Port of San Francisco, California, Appel-lee.
No. 7589.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 20, 1935.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal dismissed; mandate forthwith.