Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al., 1968 — 390 U.S. 744 · caselaw · US
General
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
390 U.S. 744·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 1159.
Decided April 29, 1968.
Alan C. Furth, Robert L. Pierce, William P. Higgins and G. Clark Cummings for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.; Ernest Porter, Dennis McCarthy, E. L. Van Dellen, Walter G. Treanor and E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., for Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.