Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Steele v. Steele, 1789 — 1 U.S. 409 · caselaw · US
General
Steele v. Steele
1 U.S. 4091 Dall. 409·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1789·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Steele v. Steele.
Practice in divorce.
This was an issue joined on the facts alleged in a libel for a divorce : and upon the trial, the Chief Justice observed, that notice ought to be given of the facts intended to be proved under the general allegations of the libel.
[MAJORITY — Rush, Justice.]
Rush, Justice.
I think it would be most convenient to give notice, that between two specific dates, acts of cruelty, &c., were intended to be proved.
The Court seemed to adopt that idea, and recommended it for the future practice of the bar.
See Garrat v. Garrat, 4 Yeates 244.