General
David Murphy et al., Respondents, v. The Stickley and Simonds Company, Impleaded with The Syracuse Savings Bank, Appellant
152 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Murphy et al., Respondents, v. The Stickley and Simonds Company, Impleaded with The Syracuse Savings Bank, Appellant.
Murphy v. Stickley Simonds Co., 82 Hun, 158, affirmed.
(Argued February 12, 1897;
decided March 2, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 10, 1894, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Harrison Hoyt for appellant.
W. P. Gannon for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur, except Haight, J., absent, and Martin, J., not sitting.