Contracts · MBE-tested
ALABAMA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
373 U.S. 545·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ALABAMA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 15,
Original.
Decided May 27, 1963.
J. Kirkman Jackson, John P. Kohn, George Stephen Leonard, Richard L. Hirshberg, John W. Vardaman, John A. Caddell and 77ms. B. Hill, Jr. for plaintiffs.
Solicitor General Cox, Ralph S. Spritzer and Louis F. Claiborne for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to file the proposed bill of complaint, as amended, is denied. In essence the papers show no more than that the President has made, ready to exercise the authority conferred upon him by 10 U. S. C. § 333 by alerting and stationing military pérsonnel in the Birmingham area. - Such purely preparatory measures and their alleged adverse general effects upon the plaintiffs afford no basis for the granting of any relief.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.