Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clarence R. Conger, as Trustee under the Will of Catharine A. Hedges, Deceased, Respondent, v. Theodore H. Conger et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 554 · caselaw · US
General
Clarence R. Conger, as Trustee under the Will of Catharine A. Hedges, Deceased, Respondent, v. Theodore H. Conger et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
185 N.Y. 554·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clarence R. Conger, as Trustee under the Will of Catharine A. Hedges, Deceased, Respondent, v. Theodore H. Conger et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
Conger v. Conger, 105 App. Div. 589, affirmed.
(Argued April 25, 1906;
decided May 15, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered August 3, 1905, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment settling the accounts of the plaintiff as trustee under the will of Catharine A. Hedges, deceased, entered upon the report of a referee.
Charles W. Dayton, Joseph E. Bullen and Walter S. Newhouse for appellants.
Albert F. Hagar for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ,