Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jens Folkman's Rederi Aktieselskab et al., Libelants-Appellees, v. THE Steamship PARIS, Her Engines, etc., Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, Claimant-Appellant, THE Steamship WILSTON, Her Engines, etc., Angus Leitch, Claimant-Appellee, THE Steam Tug OVERBROOK, Her Engines, etc., Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Claimant-Appellee (and nine other cases), 1930 — 44 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
Jens Folkman's Rederi Aktieselskab et al., Libelants-Appellees, v. THE Steamship PARIS, Her Engines, etc., Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, Claimant-Appellant, THE Steamship WILSTON, Her Engines, etc., Angus Leitch, Claimant-Appellee, THE Steam Tug OVERBROOK, Her Engines, etc., Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Claimant-Appellee (and nine other cases)
44 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jens Folkman’s Rederi Aktieselskab et al., Libelants-Appellees, v. THE Steamship PARIS, Her Engines, etc., Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, Claimant-Appellant, THE Steamship WILSTON, Her Engines, etc., Angus Leitch, Claimant-Appellee, THE Steam Tug OVERBROOK, Her Engines, etc., Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Claimant-Appellee (and nine other cases).
Nos. 65-68.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Oct. 20, 1930.
Joseph P. Nolan, of New York City, for appellant.
Haight, Smith, Griffin & Deming, of New York City (John W. Griffin, of New York City, of counsel), for libelants.
Lucian V. Axtell, of New York City (Elizabeth Robinson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Hans Fay and others.
Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (W. H. McGrann, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee the S. S. Wilston.
Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and P. Pearson Shortridge, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee the S. S. Overbrook.
Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, of New York City (D. Roger Englar and Leonard J. Mattison, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees Compania Azucarera Beola and another.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decrees [37 F.(2d) 734] affirmed on opinion of COXE, J.