Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Respondent, 1904 — 178 N.Y. 561 · caselaw · US
General
The City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Respondent
178 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The City of Buffalo, Appellant, v. The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Respondent.
Gity of Buffalo v. B., L. <6 W. R. R. Go., 68 App. Div. 488, affirmed.
(Argued February 26, 1904;
decided March 16, 1904.)
Appeal from so much of a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered February 19, 1902, as affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Charles L. Feldman for appellant.
John C. Milburn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett and Vann, JJ. Absent: Martin and Werner, JJ.